The "big ticket item" about everything that's wrong about the ending is Cloudjumper, though. (Also, that tail wouldn't have lasted 5 years without any maintenance whatsoever, but that's a different debate). What did we get?Īnd the fact that Toothless never really tried to come back also really shows the relationship he had with Hiccup was less deep than it should be. Other vikings should have shown some opposition as well, having formed some sort of bond or friendship with their dragons, with loudest complaints coming from Valka and the gang. Toothless should have opposed a great deal more. Other dragons with riders should slightly to moderately oppose. The ending implies that it was a gradual process rather than a sudden event like in the movieĢ)The movies are completely different from the books and they introduced a series of concepts and ideas that are comtradicted by the plot of the third movie, generally ruining the message of the seriesįinally i think that the final reunion is what ruined the ending for me becuse it felt like a scene from a fanfiction ( especcially the ones written after the release of the first trailer) and because it is the source of more questions than answers ( In particular : why does the reunion happen?)Īlso as you already pointed out, we see nothing of the lives of Hiccup and the other riders without their dragons before cutting to the reunion, taking away part of the emotional weight of the endingĮdit: how the f*ck did i get downvoted so quickly? This is my New personal record The problem of that the director Tried to adapt the ending of the book series, missing two key elements:ġ)In the book, The dragons leaving isn't a plotpoint : an older Hiccup simply tells us that they left to protect themself from mankind ( except a few of them like the books' version of Toothless that decided to stay and died of old age).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |